The Fiduciary Movement cannot be erased from the history books. Given heightened investor awareness (per Figure 1) of the fiduciary rule and its meaning, we think few advisors will fund much success if they do not embrace fiduciary levels of service. However, we think few in the business are prepared to fulfill the Duty of Care.

Figure 1: Interest In “Fiduciary” Reaches All Time High

 

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings.

Fiduciary duty can be broken down into two pieces: duty of loyalty & duty of care. Duty of loyalty means that the fiduciary must put their clients’ interests first and avoid conflicts. We’ve already seen lots of wealth management firms work to comply with this duty, such as Bank of America Merrill Lynch (BAC) ending commission-based accounts for retirement savers.

Duty of care, by law, means that a fiduciary must act with “care, skill, prudence, and diligence.” In contrast to the constant discussion of the duty of loyalty, we’ve seen much less attention paid to the duty of care.

As Michael Kitces writes, failure to live up to the duty of care could leave wealth managers open to painful class action lawsuits. Even if they don’t run into legal trouble, it’s hard to imagine human advisors holding on to assets against robos without a clearly articulated message for how they provide a higher level of care.

So, how does one define “care, skill, prudence, and diligence?” For starters, any investment recommendations should be based on research that is:

  • Comprehensive. Analyze all relevant publicly available (e.g. 10-Ks and 10-Qs), including the footnotes.
  • Objective. Clients deserve unbiased research.
  • Transparent. Client should be able to see how the analysis was performed and the data behind it.
  • Relevant. There must be a tangible, quantifiable connection to stock, ETF or mutual-fund performance.
  • Print Friendly, PDF & Email