While most Americans are keeping an eye on the proposed Republican-led tax reform to determine if they will personally be in the winner’s or loser’s circle when it all shakes out, some savvy investors are looking at the bigger picture.

Outside of the changes to income levels and deductions that are being floated, one notable change to the current tax code involves the proposed corporate tax cuts. For investors who are looking to add to their portfolios or are evaluating their current holdings, considering the consequences of the proposed tax overhaul makes sense.

How Will Corporations be Impacted?

The proposed corporate tax cuts are not created equal for all industries, which will create winners and losers at the corporate level.

The Trump administration’s tax plan for 2018 could have a long-lasting impact on company earnings and valuations due to several reported features that are – at least currently – included in the proposed legislation. Three of those features include a reduction in corporate taxes, “repatriation” of foreign profits for U.S. companies, and a change in how companies expense capital investments.

Corporate Tax Reductions

The plan currently approved by the U.S. House of Representatives reduces corporate taxes from 35% to 20%. This would immediately free up cash for many corporations. What will those companies do with the extra money? Some obvious choices might be investing in the corporation’s infrastructure or making acquisitions, increasing dividends to shareholders, or making stock buybacks – all of which could benefit shareholders. However, this proposal comes with the loss of some current tax breaks for corporations, such as the ability to write off debt interest; this change could significantly impact corporations (especially ones that are highly leveraged).

Repatriation of Foreign Profits

The repatriation proposal in the tax reform bill allows U.S. companies to bring back profits made outside the United States at a proposed 12% tax rate. The Trump administration anticipates this enticement will contribute to jobs and economic growth. Certainly, U.S. companies with a large foreign presence could return cash to the United States and use it for new investments, special dividends or other balance sheet-improving activities, which could benefit shareholders. However, the question is whether this tax rate represents enough incentive—or if the proposed rate will even survive the process to turn into law.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email