I always enjoy working with investors who are fully engaged in living their retirement dreams. For some that means spending time with their grand kids or taking up new hobbies. Others have more time to devote to their investment portfolio and planning the right path forward for their hard-earned nest egg. 

Investors currently in retirement are usually more risk averse than those who have time and a consistent income steam to make up for bad decisions.  During the growth phase of your life, you can afford to be more cavalier with your investment portfolio or take greater risks. However, there is a different (more conservative) mindset that comes with the knowledge that you are no longer able to make up for a big mistake.

Most investors I come into contact with are very aware of the typical pitfalls such as high fee investments, poor asset allocation choices, or inattentive financial advisors. Those are all well publicized subjects that are easily avoided through a low-cost and diversified investment portfolio made up of ETFs.

Yet, less talked about are the psychological worries over political, social, and economic cycles that induce fear-based investment decisions.  Some examples include: fretting about who the next president will be, when the Fed will raise rates, or how the socio-economic picture in China will impact our lives here at home. I haven’t met a retired investor who isn’t worried about what is going to happen to the U.S. dollar and the impact of inflation on their cost of living.

All of these concerns are certainly valid, but the first step in dealing with them is realizing that worrying isn’t going to solve anything. There is nothing that any single individual can do to impact the outcome of these events or forecast how they will move the markets. The reality is that watching 16 hours of Fox News, CNBC, or MSNBC every day isn’t going to provide any answers either.

In fact, it can lead to poor decisions during even brief corrections that are born out of fear of loss rather than sound portfolio management choices. It can also result in trying to time big events such as a Fed rate hike by making significant asset allocation changes based on what you think “should happen” rather than what does happen.