A Crack In The Market’s Bullish ArmorLast week, we discussed the current bullish trend’s ongoing, mind-numbing, narrow channel. We have suggested there was little to worry about until the market violates the 20-DMA. That “crack” to this “unstoppable” bullish rally happened Thursday.However, as we previously noted, just because the market breaks the 20-DMA does not mean we must take immediate action. What we need to see is a confirmation of that break with either a failed retest of previous support or a further decline. On Friday, the stronger-than-expected employment report sent stocks higher as “good news is good news” as more robust economic growth should support earnings. However, “bad news also remains good news,” as it would mean Fed rate cuts.In other words, we continue to be in a “heads I win, tails I win” market.Notably, on Friday, the market rally failed to retake the previous support trend of the 20-DMA. If the market is lower on Monday and takes out Thursday’s low, as shown, this would confirm the break of support and suggest lower prices. The 50-DMA will quickly become the next significant support level. While the market may remain range-bound between recent highs and the 50-DMA over the next month, we expect a deeper correction (~10%) before the election. Such a correction would likely test the 200-DMA and reverse much of the recent bullish market exuberance, as shown by both retail and professional investors. A reversal of sentiment and price deviations would provide a better entry point for increasing portfolio equity exposures. Of course, the market has been so complacent for so long that even a completely normal 5-10% correction will “feel” far worse than it is.With the market overbought and extended currently, we want to remain cautious about aggressively committing our cash reverses to the broad market. However, such can be very hard to do in a rising bull market that seems unstoppable.
“Willingness and ability to hold funds uninvested while awaiting real opportunities is a key to success in the battle for investment survival.” – Gerald Loeb
 Inflation ScareOver the last few weeks, there has been a rising chorus of “perpetually bearish” commentators shrieking about the return of inflation. Inflation did tick up in recent reports, but the scare is overblown. Such is particularly the case when reviewing the fundamental drivers of inflation over time.To put the inflation scare into proper proportion, it is vital to start with a broader overview of inflation. We receive two monthly measures of the Consumer Price Index using month-over-month and annual changes. Lately, the inflation scare has come from the pickup in the month-over-month change in the price index, as shown. As of the latest report, inflation was slightly above the long-term inflation trend. While that uptick sparked the inflation scare, it is essential to remain focused on the longer-term trend of inflation, which is still trending lower. While the rate of decline is subsiding due to the year-over-year comparisons, the Fed will achieve its 2% annualized growth rate as inflation returns to its normalized trend. Notably, in the most recent inflation report, the inflation scare came from just three areas of the report: Transportation (and Energy), Medical Care, and Education. Housing, Food and Beverage, and Apparel all registered declines. Given the state of the housing market and the subsequent lag in reporting the data, the pressure on inflation remains lower. Furthermore, the recent uptick in healthcare costs is primarily likely seasonal as annual plans reset for the new year. However, given that most American’s rent or mortgage payments and healthcare costs are set for a set period, a measure excluding those two variables gives us a better “day-to-day” measure of the cost of living. As shown below, inflation, less healthcare, and rent are closing in on 2% annualized. The crucial point is that the recent inflation scare is just that. It is mostly talking heads trying to garner headlines by “scari”g the crap” out “f investors. The reality is that disinflation remains the biggest threat to the Fed and the economy. Disinflation Risk And Wall StreetOne of the main themes we discussed last year is that the current inflation levels are not due to strong, organic economic growth. Instead, the inflation surge is a function of too much money chasing too few assets following $5 Trillion in stimulus money sent to households amid an economic shutdown. As is always the case, inflation is a primary function of supply and demand. The massive surge in stimulus sent directly to households resulted in an unprecedented spike in “savings,” creating artificial demand as represented by retail sales. As is already happening and will continue, the “bulge” of excess liquidity will revert to the previous growth trend, a disinflation risk. As a result, economic growth will lag the reversion in savings by about 12 months. This “lag effect” is critical to monetary policy outcomes and the current inflation scare. As noted, given that inflation is a “demand versus supply” function, the extraction of liquidity and monetary support continues to erode retail sales. Actual retail sales are already below the 2% annualized level that historically coincides with recessions, and the 12-month moving average is not far away. Since 1980, personal savings and economic growth have continued to decline. That correlation is obvious, considering economic growth is ~70% consumption. Unfortunately, due to the massive debt loads, the natural economic growth rate is below 2%. It is evident that following each “crisis” event,” the trend of economic growth continues to slow. The slower growth rate, caused by increased debts and deficits, will challenge the Fed as disinflation risk becomes the next monetary policy challenge. In other words, the current inflation scare will fade as disinflation continues to drag economic growth and interest rates lower. Debt Is DeflationaryOver the coming decades, the massive surge in unproductive debt will increase deflationary pressures and slower economic growth.These issues are not new. But have been plaguing economic growth for the last 40-years. Moreover, given that the baby boomer generation has reached retirement age, they will leave the workforce at an increasing rate, drawing on their accumulated financial assets. As a result, the debts and deficits will continue to detract from rather than contribute to economic growth.As shown, the surge in debt and deficits coincides with a peak in the 10-year average economic growth rate. The decline in economic prosperity adds deflationary pressures on the economy. Such requires continued government deficit spending to sustain the demands on the welfare system. The negative impact on the economy is evident. There is a significant negative correlation between the size of the government and economic growth. Instead, debt is the problem, not the solution.Lacy Hunt agrees with our assessment. Lacy Hunt On The Diminishing Returns Of Debt
“Excessive indebtedness acts as a tax on future growth. It is also consistent with Hyman Minsky’s concept of ‘Ponzi finance.‘ Such means the size and type of debt being added cannot generate a cash flow to repay principal and interest. While the debt has not resulted in the sustained instability in financial markets envisioned by Minsky, the slow reduction in economic growth and the standard of living is more insidious.

Swedish econometricians Andreas Bergh and Magnus Henrekson, writing in the prestigious Journal of Economic Surveys in 2011, substantiate that there is a ‘significant negative correlation’ between the size of government and economic growth. Specifically, ‘an increase in government size by 10 percentage points is associated with a 0.5% to 1% lower annual growth rate.‘ This suggests that if spending increases, the government expenditure multiplier will become more negative over time.

Second, Ethan Ilsetzki (London School of Economics), Enrique Mendoza (University of Pennsylvania), and Carlos Vegh (University of Maryland) in a study published by peer-reviewed the Journal of Monetary Economics in 2013 concluded that the government spending multiplier is sharply negative in highly indebted countries. The definition of highly indebted is central government debt exceeding 60% of GDP, a condition that is met by most of the major economies of the world.“The difference between the current Federal debt-to-GDP ratio and the 100% threshold impacts economic growth. The chart overlays the data against the 3-year average nominal GDP growth rate. Rising debt levels, much less the threshold, impact economic growth. As shown above, debt is harmful to long-term growth. Dr. Hunt concludes by citing peer-reviewed research.“Third, an econometric study by Alberto Alesina, Carlo Favero and Francesco Giavazzi in the Journal of International Economics in 2015, corroborates that the tax and expenditure multipliers are both negative, with the tax multiplier more negative. Quite significantly, these conclusions are supported by domestic as well as international data. Alesina is a Professor at Harvard, while Favero and Giavazzi are professors at IGIER-Bocconi.
You may want to re-read that last sentence again. Interest Rates Will Follow Economic Growth And DisinflationSince rates and expectations must adjust for the potential future impact on the current value of invested capital:

Therefore, the long-term correlation between rates, inflation, and economic growth is unsurprising. The following chart is a composite index of inflation and economic growth compared to the 10-year Treasury yield. Currently, interest rates reflect the level of economic activity and inflation. As the composite reverts to its long-term mean, interest rates will trend lower to reflect the saAs expected, the surge in economic growth and inflation pulled longer-duration yields higher. With a correlation of nearly 85% between interest rates and a GDP/Inflation composite index, investors should expect rates to fall as economic growth and inflation decline.From one month to the next, inflation will tick up and down as economic activity continues. Currently, economic data remains strong and will likely continue for several more months as the impulses of monetary policies continue to work their way through the system. However, those impulses will fade over the next few years, and economic activity will revert to its long-term trend of 2% growth or less. As such, inflation and interest rates will follow suit.It is the basics of economics and the impact of surging debts and rising deficits. How We Are Trading ItWhat causes the market to break its bullish trajectory is entirely unknown. The 10% correction last year didn’t take an overwhelming catalyst other than disappointment that the Federal Reserve might keep rates “higher for longer” than Wall Street wanted. That disappointment could be the same again as the markets are beginning to slash rate cut expectations further for this year.Whatever trigger causes a reversal in the bullish signals, we will act accordingly to reduce risk and rebalance exposures. But one thing is sure: investor sentiment is extremely bullish, which has almost always been a good “bearish signal” to be more cautious.While we have warned of a potential correction over the past few weeks, it reminds us much of June and July last year, where similar warnings for a 10% correction went unheeded. We have rebalanced exposures and taken profits in some positions with significant gains for the year, and will likely do this again if the market violates its 20-DMA. We are now seeing many individuals “jumping into the pool” in some of the most speculative areas of the market. Such is usually a sign that we are closer to a market peak than not. As such, we want to make adjustments before the correction comes.While it is not time to be overly bearish, continue basic portfolio management rules to reduce risks.

Complacency is not a good way to manage a portfolio.More By This Author:Credit Stress Is Brewing As Market Complacency Rises
Powell Indicates Balance Between Inflation and Employment
Market Corrections Matter More Than You Think