As most financial media will remind you, today is the 7 year anniversary of the market’s lows hit on March 9, 2009, a day when the Wall Street Journal wondered “How low can stocks go”, which took less than a week after Obama said on March 3 that “what you’re now seeing is profit-and-earning ratios are starting to get to the point where buying stocks is a potentially good deal if you’ve got a long-term perspective on it” (sic) and just days before the Fed officially launched its expanded QE1 asset purchasing program.

What took place since then has been the most remarkable, central-bank supported rally of risk assets in history, with the S&P rising some 200% to hit all time highs around 2,100 just one year ago, and restoring $14 trillion to stock values. In fact, the move since March 9, 2009 is now the third longest bull market in history, and just days away from being the second longest rally on record.

Now, as Bloomberg writes, “investors are awash in angst, showing little faith the run can continue. They worry about contracting corporate earnings, slowing Chinese growth and uncertainty over interest rates. And they’re walking the talk by pulling cash from stocks at almost the fastest rate on record. It’s not unwarranted – the S&P 500 has gained just 0.5 percent in the last 18 months.”

What Bloomberg is confused by is that despite this unprecedented rally, after a brief period of inflows in 2013 and 2014, investors have been pulling money out of stocks at a record pace, leading not only Bloomberg but many others to dub the move in the market as the “most-hated rally ever.” What Bloomberg fails to note is that as everyone else has been selling, corporations have unleashed the biggest debt-funded stock buyback spree in history, providing the natural offset to wholesale selling by virtually everyone else, and allowing the market to barely dip over the past year.