A strong track record of investment performance is always the most important factor for asset managers looking to attract capital: that’s what the conventional wisdom would have us believe. But a recent Chestnut Advisory study reached a very different conclusion. According to an analysis of asset flows and testimonials by institutional investors, performance is actually lower on the list of deciding factors.

What’s at the top? Effective investor relations.

Asset managers who establish trust through communications and support appear to be more successful at raising money than those who perform well but fall short in client outreach and education. In fact, 92% of institutional investors surveyed said that they consider IR to be integral to an asset manager’s mission. Those firms that lead on the communications front outpace IR laggards when it comes to retaining capital and leveraging client relationships as well:

The survey shows that trusted asset managers raise more assets, are hired more quickly and are fired more slowly than the general population of asset managers. They also have an easier time cross-selling and up-selling their clients.

And the study yields data to back up these assertions. In evaluating asset flows for 931 investment products for the period 2006 to 2013 across four different asset categories, Chestnut discovered the following:

  • Top investment performers raised less than 25% of the capital of top asset accumulators.
  • Asset managers with successful IR efforts brought in $133 billion more than managers with the best returns over that time period.
  • While the worst investment performers lost $14 billion in redemptions over that period, the firms that had the worst net asset flows—presumably, those that did not earn investors’ trust—lost more than $106 billion.
  • The Navatar View:

    Investment managers continue to face the challenge of commoditization. Investment strategies, processes, return streams can often look very similar to an investor.

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email