Risk embraced by investors (again).

If a picture’s worth a thousand words, I’m gonna save myself a lot of work today.

The jobs data are in: a beat, to be sure, for the headline number, but some worrisome digits for average wages and work hours.

Folks don’t seem to be sweating the small stuff, though. Investors and traders have been stepping up the risk ladder lately. BIG time. You can see this reflected in the pricing of some key exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

The PowerShares S&P 500 High Beta ETF (NYSE Arca: SPHB) strips out the most volatile components of the S&P bench while its stablemate, the PowerShares S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (NYSE Arca: SPLV) does the opposite. Divide SPLV’s price by SPHB’s and, voilà, you have a quick indicator of the market’s aversion to risk.

By that measure, March has started out as a “risk-on” month. You can see this illustrated in Chart 1 below. 

This month, folks seem more willing to buy the riskiest assets, a broadening trend confirmed by yet another ETF ratio.

The Guggenheim S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (NYSE Arca: RSP) rejiggers the blue chip index to give each issue the same heft, thereby amping up the influence of smaller-capitalized companies. The traditional capitalization-weighted benchmark, epitomized by the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSE Arca: SPY), skews heavily toward its larger components. Roughly half of SPY’s price is determined by mega-cap ($200+ billion) stocks; these giant firms take up only 11 percent of RSP’s mass.

Index RSP’s price to SPY’s and you get a measure of market breadth. We’ve seen a rebound in market breadth since late January (see Chart 2). 

Since February, we’ve also witnessed declines in the CBOE S&P 500 Volatility Index (CBOE: VIX) and the CBOE S&P 500 Implied Correlation Index (CBOE: KCJ). Pretty much everyone recalls the VIX as the “fear index,” but the correlation index is less well known.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email